In defense of the panel that decided Kish v. Grayson on August 7, there was no appellee’s brief filed to contradict the pro se appeal of Mr. Grayson. But there was a clear and amply quoted trial court ruling that illustrated how this case seems to be a slam/dunk “affirm” of the Allegheny County trial court. We write because the case illustrates some pretty common trends in support court and the appeals court bobbled its …
SubscribeTo
Pennsylvania Divorce and Domestic Relations Blog
Previous Posts